http://www.airplanessale.info/airplane-parts-pentagon-9-11/
what really went down in 9/11?
okay im only 14 but i love poitics and i dont think that wat was told to us about 9/11 is tru. why? well fire cant melt steel u need thermite and oddly enough after we were done “fixing”the top floor a few months before we all of a sudden find thermite WEIRD RIGHT? and in the pentagon why didnt we find plane parts and a nice little hole that exeted the other side that was not even close to be fitting an airplane.and why on that day was nobody in that part of the building at that time? all i can say is this country is so messed up!!!!! please tell wat u think.
What you believe is wrong. That is the problem with belief. You should exchange your belief for objective truth.
Tests have actually been conducted which prove conclusively that structural steel can fail when exposed to the types of tempurates found inside the WTC towers from burning jet fuel and building materials in just a matter of minutes. Tests with Thermite meanwhile proved conclusively that Thermite even when used in enormous (ie: totally impractical) quantities could not cause the failure of structural steel. These tests were broadcast on the National Geographic Channel last year and are re-aired from time to time.
No conclusive evidence of the presence of thermite has ever been found at the WTC. The private group that makes this claim has severe credibility problems and can not account for the source and validity of its test samples. No one else has been able to independently substantiate their claims. Besides, we already know from the NG tests that thermite is completely ineffective at weakening structural steel. It simply does not burn for anything like an adequate amount of time. When these folks prove you can bring down a building with thermite AND provide, conclusive, independently varifiable evidence of thermite in the WTC then you might have something. But they haven’t so you don’t.
At the Pentagon they most assuredly found aircraft parts, clearly identifiable aircraft parts even to a layperson and they found them all over the place. Photographs and video of those parts, much of it taken just minutes after the crash are incredibly easy to find with even the most rudimentary Google search. The size and shape of the impact hole and subsequent damage has been tested with computer and physical modelling and found absolutely consistent with the damage done to the Pentagon. Then of course there are the over 140 witnesses who saw the aircraft either impact the building or fly extremely low towards it, compounded with the physical evidence left by the low-flying aircraft such as downed light poles and signs. If this overwhelming evidence is somehow not convincing to you then you are left with the other problem – even if you totally discount that overwhelming physical and eyewitness evidence of an aircraft impact, what else could have caused that sort of damage? A missile or bomb would have left a crater and would not have penetrated into the building horizontally in that way. Also, no eyewitness saw anything remotely resembling such a device, nor was any physical evidence recovered that would indicate such a device. And what happened then to the plane?
Honestly, I think you need to improve your standards of evidence and critical analysis and not believe the first thing you see on the interweb or Facetube. And remember, the world is full of people who are quite happy to lie to you in order to advance some aggenda or another. Follow evidence, not extraordinary claims. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence and the evidence simply does not support what you propose.
PENTAGON PLANE PARTS